copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Contextual difference between That is why vs Which is why? Thus we say: You never know, which is why but You never know That is why And goes on to explain: There is a subtle but important difference between the use of that and which in a sentence, and it has to do primarily with relevance Grammarians often use the terms "restrictive" and "non-restrictive" when it comes to relative clauses
grammaticality - Is it incorrect to say, Why cannot. . . . ? - English . . . Since we can say "Why can we grow taller?", "Why cannot we grow taller?" is a logical and properly written negative We don't say "Why we can grow taller?" so the construct should not be "Why we cannot grow taller?" The reason is that auxiliaries should come before the subject to make an interrogative
Do you need the “why” in “Thats the reason why”? [duplicate] Relative why can be freely substituted with that, like any restrictive relative marker I e, substituting that for why in the sentences above produces exactly the same pattern of grammaticality and ungrammaticality: the reason that he did it * the cause that he did it * the intention that he did it * the effect that he did it * the thing that
“John Doe”, “Jane Doe” - Why are they used many times? There is no recorded reason why Doe, except there was, and is, a range of others like Roe So it may have been a set of names that all rhymed and that law students could remember Or it could be that they were formed from a mnemonic, like the english pronouciation of a prayer or scripture in Latin Greek
Why not? vs. Why not. - English Language Usage Stack Exchange My question is: is there flexibility in how one can punctuate the phrase "Why not?" The answer may seem obvious at first it is a question after all However, it's also a common idiom, and I am