copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Is Psychology Today a credible source? So in that sense, Psych Today might bring up a topic that the wider public finds interesting, and that perhaps we can provide a more scientific answer to I agree with these points when seeing a question using Psychology Today as a reference, but I have trouble accepting answers purely based on Psychology Today articles For answers
Are we to accept only Wikipedia links in answers? - Psychology . . . Personally, I agree, and if we accepted Wikipedia generally, is that going to lead to Psychology Today being acceptable in a general sense? What is the consensus? For a balanced view, see Is Wikipedia a reliable source? on Medical Sciences SE; Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? on Academia SE; Reliability of Wikipedia on
What are reliable sources? - Psychology Neuroscience Meta Stack Exchange One concern is that if we accept Wikipedia for non-professional questions, then what about other resources: TED talks, random blogs, magazines, Psychology Today? Read more: Is Wikipedia a reliable source? on Medical Sciences SE; Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? on Academia SE; Reliability of Wikipedia on Wikipedia
Name change of CogSci - what about Psychology? The [pending] site's name [change] has been on my mind for quite a while I may be off here, but my preference now (I voted for Mind amp; Brain earlier in some lost meta post) is: Psychology Bef