STILMOBIL centro arredamento s.r.l.Business Directories,Company Directories

Company Name: Corporate Name:	STILMOBIL centro arredamento s.r.l.
Company Title:
Company Description:
Keywords to Search:
Company Address:	via T. Taddeini 295,Montespertoli fi 50025 - Italy,,Italy
ZIP Code: Postal Code:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Website:
Email:
Number of Employees:
Sales Amount:
Credit History: Credit Report:
Contact Person:
Remove my name

Company Directories & Business Directories

copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!

Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples:
WordPress Example, Blogger Example)

Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer

(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)

Previous company profile:
STILLGRAFIX
STILMA s.r.l.
STILMETAL S.a.s.

Next company profile:
STILOGRAFICA di Lei e C.
STILRUSSO SAS DI ANNA MARIA RUSSO C.
STILUS srl

Company News:

Is it right? or Is it correct? - English Language Usage Stack . . .
Right can be used more often than correct Correct implies something is absolutely true Right can be used in matters of opinion edit for referencing Let's consider the math problem 2+2 We can use right and correct as follows: "2+2=4, is it right?" "2+2=4, is it correct?" Both are acceptable However, let's now introduce a matter of opinion - "George Bush invaded Iraq, is it right?" "George
right vs correct - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Except for the fact that we use right to denote direction, what is the difference between the two terms right and correct? Also, which one is the preferred construction between these two? Am I rig
As on 16 May vs. as of 16 May — which is correct?
They are both correct for different situations For example, As on 16 May, he again failed to arrive at work on time and As of 16 May he will have worked here for a full year
phrases - Is it correct to say correct A to B? - English Language . . .
In the fix-a-written-mistake context, it certainly is ok to say "correct A to B " Granted, in your example one cannot correctly replace replace with correct
grammaticality - Which is correct: the below information or the . . .
In short, "the below information" is not generally accepted to be correct, because "below" is not universally acknowledged as an adjective Nevertheless, some dictionaries specifically list this as an exception
grammaticality - Which is correct, you and I or you and me . . .
As simple tip to understand which one to use, remove "you and" in the sentence, and see if the sentence is still correct (apart from the verbs that need to be changed from plural to singular)
Which is correct: with regards to, in regards with, regarding?
Are those correct? If yes - are they equivalent or the usage depends on context? It's much easier to answer your question if you put in some examples you've seen Anyway I hope the above is enough Note that there is a completely different usage "regards to" as in "give my regards to old Broadway and tell them I will soon be there" etc
verbs - Is is that grammatically correct? - English Language Usage . . .
Is it correct to say "The reason is because "? (9 answers) Closed 5 years ago Can the words " is " and " that " be used back-to-back in the following sentence? The reason I went to the store is that I ran out of milk Similarly, can " is " and " because " be used as such? For example: The reason I went to the store is because I ran out of milk
What is the proper way to say possesive with person X and self?
Note: "mine and Julie's" is indeed grammatical However, etiquette and common courtesy dictate that you should always name yourself last Thus depending on your context, you may still wish to avoid "mine and Julie's", albeit grammatically correct
Correct or correctly: I got them all correct correctly?
No, all the answers were correct, not correctly You get something right, not rightly You would only say "I got them all correctly" if you were concerned about the manner in which the questions were answered, not the result of your responses