copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
What is the difference between . . and source? [duplicate] When the script is done, any changes that it made to the environment are discarded script The above sources the script It is as if the commands had been typed in directly Any environment changes are kept source script This also sources the script The source command is not required by POSIX and therefore is less portable than the shorter
What is the difference between ~ . profile and ~ . bash_profile? The original sh sourced profile on startup bash will try to source bash_profile first, but if that doesn't exist, it will source profile Note that if bash is started as sh (e g bin sh is a link to bin bash) or is started with the --posix flag, it tries to emulate sh, and only reads profile Footnotes: Actually, the first one of bash_profile, bash_login, profile See also: Bash
What is the difference between . and source in shells? 2 source is there for readability and self-documentation, exists because it is quick to type The commands are identical Perl has long and short versions of many of its control variables for the same reason
Source vs . why different behaviour? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange source is a shell keyword that is supposed to be used like this: source file where file contains valid shell commands These shell commands will be executed in the current shell as if typed from the command line
Use config file for my shell script - Unix Linux Stack Exchange 36 source is not secure as it will execute arbitrary code This may not be a concern for you, but if file permissions are incorrect, it may be possible for an attacker with filesystem access to execute code as a privileged user by injecting code into a config file loaded by an otherwise-secured script such as an init script
Building a custom kernel in Debian - Unix Linux Stack Exchange In this case, apt source downloaded the native linux-signed-amd64_* tar xz source package and then unpacks it When we use debuild or dpkg-buildpackage, we normally generate the source package and all binary packages
Is there a way to download pure Unix? I'm just asking out of curiosity, is there a way to obtain a 'pure' so to say copy of Unix? So, not OS X or Linux with Unix in the background, but simply Unix