copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Diaz-Torres v. Barr, No. 18-70141 (9th Cir. 2020) :: Justia In this case, nothing in the record addresses whether Mexican society views either of petitioner's proposed social groups as distinct; no laws or proposed legislation so indicate; nor do any country conditions reports or news articles mention such a group
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Diaz-Torres testified that it is well understood in Mexico that Mexican professionals are targeted by cartels He stated, for example, that agricultural engineers and other licensed professionals are regularly killed in his town for refusing to work with the cartels
Diaz-Torres v. Barr | 963 F. 3d 976 | 9th Cir. | Judgment | Law - CaseMine Miguel Diaz-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief from removal under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT relief")
Diaz-Torres v. Barr | No. 18-70141 | 9th Cir. | Judgment | Law - CaseMine Mr Diaz-Torres applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"), arguing that he was a member of the particular social group of Mexican "professionals who refuse to cooperate with drug cartels "
Miguel Diaz-Torres v. William Barr – CourtListener. com Mr Diaz-Torres applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), arguing that he was a member of the particular social group of Mexican “professionals who refuse to cooperate with drug cartels ”
Torres v. Barr | 976 F. 3d 918 | 9th Cir. | Judgment | Law - CaseMine Torres contested her removability under § 1182 (a) (7) before the IJ, arguing that because she had lawfully entered the CNMI in 1997 before the INA went into effect, and because she had never submitted an application for admission into the United States, she fell outside the scope of that provision
Miguel Diaz-Torres v. William Barr - biahelp. com FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIGUEL DIAZ-TORRES, Nos 18-70141 Petitioner, 18-72700 v Agency No A089-247-266 WILLIAM P BARR, Attorney General, Respondent
Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653 (9th Cir. 2020) :: Justia She was charged as removable under § 1182 (a) (6) and § 1182 (a) (7) Torres argued that she fell outside the scope of § 1182 (a) (7) on the grounds that she had lawfully entered the CNMI before the INA went into effect and had never submitted an application for admission into the United States