Marvel.com: The Official Site | Iron Man, Spider-Man, Hulk, X-Men, Wolverine and the heroes of the Marvel Universe.Comics, News, Movies and Video Games | Marvel.com
Company Description:
enter marvel.com, the best place to connect with other fans and get news about comics' greatest super-heroes: iron man, thor, captain america, the x-men, and more.
copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
philosophy of science - What is nothing? - Philosophy Stack Exchange In the context of a "universe from nothing," it means the absence of anything capable of being observed (directly or indirectly) by human beings A "lower degree" would be "vacuum," which is the absence of matter particles A "higher degree" would be "absolute nothing," which would be the absence of everything - matter, particles, energy
Nothingness cannot be. Does that imply something must be? 9 One must be careful when considering objects, conditions, and phenomena Nothingness doesn't be, that's the definition of nothingness (at least in this question) that what is not, does not exist "Nothingness" is the condition of the absence of anything In this sense, "nothing doesn't be" in the same sense that "running doesn't be" — it's
Something vs Nothing. Reality of 0? - Philosophy Stack Exchange First, it's very important to distinguish between the mind's conception of "nothing" and "nothing" itself, in which the mind would not be there When I use the term "nothing", I'm talking about "nothing" itself Second, we define "nothing" as the lack of "something" from the perspective of our minds, which exist and our "something"
metaphysics - Why is there something instead of nothing? - Philosophy . . . 1 The question is impossible, You've assumed that there is Something rather than Nothing, and in metaphysics when we do this we are dead in the water It's this reification of objects that causes all the problems The impossibility of answering this question should tell us something but not many want to hear it
existence - How can we represent nothing or nothingness in . . . Take a look at the way Spencer-Brown applies his Laws of Form to logic If you equate 'nothing' with an unmarked state, a mark cancelling another out = the unmarked state If you equate it with an act of distinction per se, then it becomes a mark See Appx 2 p 90 of the 2010 edition available here
fallacies - Is better than nothing a logical fallacy? - Philosophy . . . 1 It depends on the situation For an example having a small car, can be better than having no car (if you have a need for it), but eating once in a week will lead to the death of the person similarly to having nothing to eat So some times something is better than nothing, but other times something is equal to nothing
Is there a philosophy which argues that nothing exists? 0 That nothing exists is posited in medieval ontology In this attempt mysticism arrives at a peculiar speculation, peculiar because it transforms the idea of essence in general, which is an ontological determination of a being, the essentia entis, into a being and makes the ontological ground of a being, its possibility, its essence, into
Why isnt the dictum something cant come from nothing a matter of . . . "Nothing" denotes an absence of anything to refer to Definitions: something (some thing): A thing that could be referred to nothing (no thing): There not being a thing to refer to Tautologically, something can't come from nothing because nothing isn't a thing; by definition, nothing doesn't refer to a thing at all, even to a thing that doesn
Is Nothing actually imaginable? - Philosophy Stack Exchange Jan 7, 2013 at 16:05 Sometimes, answers are simple Nothing cannot be imagined because one does not imagine absences of anything, only things (which may lack something, but then you are merely imagining a thing without another thing) @SAHornickel - Not imagining anything is not the same as imagining nothing
Is the statement Nothing is absolute a contradiction? Yes, it is a contradiction, and it arises from the fact that the statement is self-referent (in saying that nothing is absolute, the statement is also asserting that itself is not absolute) Self-reference will commonly lead to such kind of contradiction Share Improve this answer answered May 7, 2017 at 23:08