copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Why does scanf() need %lf for doubles, when printf() is okay with . . . %lf for double %Lf for long double; It just so happens that when arguments of type float are passed as variadic parameters, such arguments are implicitly converted to type double This is the reason why in printf format specifiers %f and %lf are equivalent and interchangeable In printf you can "cross-use" %lf with float or %f with double
c - Correct format specifier for double in printf - Stack Overflow Format %lf is a perfectly correct printf format for double, exactly as you used it There's nothing wrong with your code Format %lf in printf was not supported in old (pre-C99) versions of C language, which created superficial "inconsistency" between format specifiers for double in printf and scanf That superficial inconsistency has been
c - Meaning of %lf place holder - Stack Overflow %lf means the same as %f (as opposed to your link which says that %lf isn't even a thing) Also, this is a C question, so C++ references are less than ideal The library behaviour can differ in subtle ways between the two languages The C Standard is one place you could link to (search for N1570) –
c - What is the difference between %0. 2lf and %. 2lf as printf . . . This means that both float and double reach printf as double and therefore %f and %lf both expect double and therefore are the same This is why also you never see %hd because it works exactly the same as %d Additionally this is why you don't need to cast a char to int if it is given to %d
Difference between CR LF, LF and CR line break types CR and LF are control characters, respectively coded 0x0D (13 decimal) and 0x0A (10 decimal) They are used to mark a line break in a text file As you indicated, Windows uses two characters the CR LF sequence; Unix (and macOS starting with Mac OS X 10 0) only uses LF; and the classic Mac OS (before 10 0) used CR An apocryphal historical
How do I force Git to use LF instead of CR+LF under Windows? git config --global core eol lf git config --global core autocrlf input For repos (Git repositories) that were checked out after those global settings were set, everything will be checked out as whatever it is in the repo – hopefully LF (\n) Any CRLF will be converted to just LF on check-in (commit)
How to fix Git warning: LF will be replaced by CRLF A script I was using was changing line endings from CRLF to CR The command git diff outputs a similar message LF will be replaced by CRLF the next time Git touches it for each file The message is sent to stderr, so to supress the message use git diff 2> dev null –
windows - Git replacing LF with CRLF - Stack Overflow The warning "LF will be replaced by CRLF" says that you (having autocrlf=true) will lose your unix-style LF after commit-checkout cycle (it will be replaced by windows-style CRLF) Git doesn't expect you to use unix-style LF under Windows
Trying to commit Git files but getting :: fatal: LF would be replaced . . . When it is enabled, git will convert CRLF to LF during commit and LF to CRLF during checkout A file that contains a mixture of LF and CRLF before the commit cannot be recreated by git For text files this is the right thing to do: it corrects line endings such that we have only LF line endings in the repository