copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Can we use the verb hath in modern English? [closed] No Hath is archaic and is not used in current spoken or written English, unless you are deliberately trying to sound very old-fashioned (as in, 400 years out-of-date)
What is a good example of a subcontext? - English Language Learners . . . He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept Ambition should be made of sterner stuff Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a
tense - What is the difference between What happened? and What has . . . Present perfect must have some 'contact' with present; if I see a bandage on your hand, then I would say 'What has happened?' If you say you had an accident in the past but now everything is fine then I ask you 'Why, what happened?' At least grammar says so, but language is alive and changes with context and speakers, so the rules are one thing and the usage another
had given or gave? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange Both are correct, and it will depend on location which form is more commonly used (I would consider had given to be the correct answer but gave would be ok ) kept is the imperfect form of keep, gave is the imperfect form of give and had given is the perfect form [of give] If written with the linking word that (which then sounds like "better" English): Rose kept the promise that she had given