copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Why use as. factor () instead of just factor () - Stack Overflow ‘factor(x, exclude = NULL)’ applied to a factor without ‘NA’s is a no-operation unless there are unused levels: in that case, a factor with the reduced level set is returned ‘as factor’ coerces its argument to a factor It is an abbreviated (sometimes faster) form of ‘factor’ Performance: as factor > factor when input is a factor The word "no-operation" is a bit ambiguous
Convert existing dataframe variable to factor in Tidyverse When you have an existing character variable in a dataframe, is there an easy method for converting that variable to a factor using the tidyverse format? For example, the 2nd line of code below won't reorder the factor levels, but the last line will
r - list all factor levels of a data. frame - Stack Overflow with dplyr::glimpse(data) I get more values, but no infos about number values of factor-levels Is there an automatic way to get all level informations of all factor vars in a data frame?
How to reorder factor levels in a tidy way? - Stack Overflow A couple comments: reordering a factor is modifying a data column The dplyr command to modify a data column is mutate All arrange does is re-order rows, this has no effect on the levels of the factor and hence no effect on the order of a legend or axis in ggplot All factors have an order for their levels The difference between an ordered = TRUE factor and a regular factor is how the
r - Changing factor levels with dplyr mutate - Stack Overflow 19 From my understanding, the currently accepted answer only changes the order of the factor levels, not the actual labels (i e , how the levels of the factor are called) To illustrate the difference between levels and labels, consider the following example:
r - How to convert a factor to integer\numeric without loss of . . . See the Warning section of ?factor: In particular, as numeric applied to a factor is meaningless, and may happen by implicit coercion To transform a factor f to approximately its original numeric values, as numeric(levels(f))[f] is recommended and slightly more efficient than as numeric(as character(f)) The FAQ on R has similar advice
r - summarizing counts of a factor with dplyr - Stack Overflow I want to group a data frame by a column (owner) and output a new data frame that has counts of each type of a factor at each observation The real data frame is fairly large, and there are 10 diff
r - ggplot2: Reorder items in a legend - Stack Overflow (2) I cannot find a question about ordering (of axis or legend elements) in ggplot2 that is not completely resolved by the use of factor( , levels=) When you define the factor and specify the ordering of said factors using levels=, then ggplot2 tends to honor that specification