copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
www. adrforum. com Complainant is Invesco Ltd (“Complainant”), represented by Mary Grace Gallagher of Alston Bird, LLP, Georgia, USA Respondent is Donal Leahy Capital Assets Acquisitions (“Respondent”), Ireland REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <globalinvesco com>, registered with Everyones Internet, Ltd dba SoftLayer
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM The Panel finds that this use is not abona fideoffering of goods or services under Policy ¶¶ 4 (c) (i) (iii) ”); see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial
Invesco Ltd. v Terehov Maksim Olegovich Complainant is Invesco Ltd (“Complainant”), represented by Theresa Conduah of Alston Bird LLP, North Carolina, USA Respondent is Terehov Maksim Olegovich (“Respondent”), Russia
www. adrforum. com See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA1733167 (ForumJuly 10, 2017) ("Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ");
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Herbalife Int’l, Inc v Farmana, D2005-0765 (WIPO Oct 3, 2005) (parking of the domain name for many years constitutes no more than a passive use or de facto activity, which activity can reinforce a finding of no legitimate interest), see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM Panel finds that Complainant has made a prima faciecase that Respondent lacks a right or interest in the disputed domain name (see, for example,Invesco Ltd v Premanshu RanaForumbona fide onus shifts to Respondent
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (ForumJuly 10, 2017) ("Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ") The Panel finds that Complainant has satisfied Policy ¶ 4 (a) (ii)
DECISION - adrforum. com See Navistar International Corporation v N RahmanyForum <cherryind com> not <cherryind com> See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel Admission Virus(Forum bona fideSee Ripple Labs Inc v NGYEN NGOC PHUONG THAOForum bona fide see also, Invesco Ltd v Premanshu RanaForum bona fide
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”)
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM Diverting Internet users to an infringing website do not represent a bona fideoffering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use per Policy ¶¶ 4 (c) (i) or (iii) See Ripple Labs Inc v NGYEN NGOC PHUONG THAO, FA 1741737 (ForumAug 21, 2017) ("Respondent uses the [disputed]domain name to divert Internet users to Respondent