copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
G. R. No. 146364 - The Lawphil Project The assignment of rights between Perez and Pajuyo, and the Kasunduan between Pajuyo and Guevarra, did not have any legal effect Pajuyo and Guevarra are in pari delicto or in equal fault
Pajuyo v. CA (G. R. No. 146364, June 3, 2004) - Scribd In 1994, Pajuyo demanded that Guevarra vacate the property but Guevarra refused The MTC and RTC ruled in favor of Pajuyo, finding the agreement created a landlord-tenant relationship However, the CA reversed, finding both parties were squatters and equally at fault
08 Pajuyo v. Ct. of Appeals, G. R. No. 146364, 474 Phil 557 (2004)_. pdf On 8 December 1985, Pajuyo and private respondent Eddie Guevarra ("Guevarra") executed a Kasunduan or agreement Pajuyo, as owner of the house, allowed Guevarra to live in the house for free provided Guevarra would maintain the cleanliness and orderliness of the house
Pajuyo v. CA | PDF | Appeal | Appellate Court - Scribd The Supreme Court reviewed a petition from Colito T Pajuyo regarding an ejectment case against Eddie Guevarra, where the Court of Appeals reversed earlier rulings in favor of Pajuyo, declaring both parties as squatters without legal rights to the property
PAJUYO V CA and GUEVARRA | PDF | Lease | Justice - Scribd Since Pajuyo admitted that he resurfaced only in 1994 to claim the property, the appellate court held that Guevarra has a better right over the property under Proclamation No 137 ISSUE: Whether the Kasunduan voluntarily entered into was a commodatum, instead of a Contract of Lease as found by MTC HELD: NO