copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
ATF+3 vs. Atf+4? | BobIsTheOilGuy ATF+4 is pretty much a dealer item From what I understand there is difference and it may not be a good idea to try to substitute ATF+3 Call around to your local Chrysler,Dodge and jeep, dealers for the best price
Trying ATF in Harley primary | BobIsTheOilGuy But I'm loving the extra smoothness the ATF provides as you feather out the clutch when in gear Also, I'm no engineer but logic would make me guess there's nothing going on in a Harley primary in the way of plates, bearings, gears, etc that you don't see in cars trucks that use ATF for many times the OCI a Harley would see
Amsoil Multi-Vehicle ATF? ATF+4? Debate settled?! Well Amsoil recommends their Multi-Vehicle ATF for ATF+4 applications, and their Fuel-Efficient ATF for Toyota WS applications This doesn't stop others from debating the ATF+4 compatibility though
Mazda ATF-FZ Alternatives (List) | BobIsTheOilGuy I put together a list of alternatives for the OEM Mazda ATF-FZ automatic transmission fluid The manufacturer datasheets specify Mazda ATF-FZ as an application
ATF 3353 vs. Dex III vs. Dex VI | BobIsTheOilGuy Hi, MB 236 12 ATF is also known as ATF 3353 236 12 is backwards compatible with the older sheet 236 fluids for MB ATs, and would be applicable for the 722 3 unit in my MB 300CD Ive been running Dex III, nothing wrong with that, but why not run a different better fluid, particularly since
ATF+4 Choices and Amsoil | BobIsTheOilGuy I've read a few posts here and there stating that the Amsoil Multi AFT is not a good choice for Chrysler vehicles that require ATF+4 Why this is, I'm not sure What is the thoughts on this? Amsoil's site shows a comparison of the ATF+4 and Amsoil ATF protection after 100k and a tear down of the
Honda Multi-Vehicle ATF Comparison Chart | BobIsTheOilGuy I thought this would be helpful just for comparison sake I'd love to add more data to this, perhaps Castrol Import Forumula, Beck Arnley Z1, and the newer Blue bottle Valvoline Import formula (non hi-mi formula)
Comparing Mercon V, ATF+3, ATF+4 specs | BobIsTheOilGuy I guess that's why in TSB 21-004-04 DaimlerChrysler states the following: "A new transmission fluid (ATF+4 - Type 9602) has been developed and is being used as factory fill for all vehicles with Chrysler automatic transmissions ATF+4 is compatible with ATF+3 and ATF+2 ATF+4 can be used to top off vehicles that currently have ATF+2 or ATF+3 except for 1999 and earlier minivans with the
ATf+4 vs DEXRON VI in an OD Chrysler Transmission On another forum I frequent, A poster who posts and knowledge I have learned to respect, recently said it is better to use Dex VI in any application that calls for ATF+4 as it is superior in every way and backwards compatible Call me Dubious What say you?
ATF+4 vs Universal ATF. | BobIsTheOilGuy I am stocking up for spring service on my JKU, have Amsoil 75w90, 75w140, ATF+4 for powersteering T case, but wondering if using Amsoil ATF in my trans (W5A-580 Auto) is worth the risk since it is a universal ATF? Or just buy synthetic ATF+4?