copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Which is correct, neither is or neither are? In formal usage, it should definitely be is: Neither of these options is available This is the traditional rule (iirc, Fowler’s discusses this at length) However, in colloquial usage, either option is fine, and are seems to now be somewhat more common, at least on teh internets A commenter here nicely describes the sort of thought process which probably pushes people (usually
There is or There are a large quantity of people? I thought this excerpt from Oxford Dictionaries was instructive: Although the expression ‘a number’ is strictly singular, the phrase ‘a number of’' is used with plural nouns (as what grammarians call a determiner (or determiner)) The verb should therefore be plural: A number of people are waiting for the bus This is not the case with ‘the number’, which is still singular: The
word choice - What is the name of the symbols - and gt;? +1, I like that this is the first answer to address the multiple Unicode code points involved However, I think you might mention that regardless of the characters' names or official prescriptions for use, the less-than and greater-than signs are commonly used as a type of brackets, probably because they can easily be typed and their display is more widely supported than that of the other symbols
What would you call this fenced training area for horses? [ODO] () has << paddock noun 1 A small field or enclosure where horses are kept or exercised >> But this is obviously a hypernym 'Fenced training area for horses' works reasonably well, but 'paddock' is less of a mouthful
Have to be or are to be: difference in meaning? Given that it is a necessity that both instruments sound true during the show, we could say that the sentence is trying to express the urgency of tuning the instruments Therefore, it can be that " have to be " is most appropriate in this context, although both versions are grammatically acceptable As Dan added, context is lacking to precisely pin down the correct one Looking at difference
Why are the donkey and the butt both named ass? It's a historical accident—they’re really two different words In the sense buttocks, the word goes back to OE ærs, and beyond that to Proto Indo-European: there are cognates in Greek, Hittite and Old Irish This is reflected in the ordinary British English arse —the {r} is dropped only in US English In the sense donkey, the word goes back to OE assa, derived (it is thought) via Celtic
is or A set of - English Language Usage Stack Exchange @DavidSchwartz The complete sentence is "Since it is virtually impossible to objectively define a set of characteristics in a society that is are desirable for everyone, …" But in my understanding (though I am not a native speaker) is, that the is are has to refer either to the set or the characteristics and therefore the beginning of the sentence doesn't matter
None of us is vs None of us are, Which is Correct? Background We have a motivational poster in our office that says: None of us is as smart as all of us I think that it's grammatically incorrect, and here is my reasoning: All of the tigers have