copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Which preposition is used with accommodating: to for If you are trying to say people will be will to do things accommodating to accommodating towards might be used accommodating for might not have a meaning you are not, except in certain parts of Amsterdam
american english - The confusion about the word accommodation . . . Accommodation as a place to stay is uncountable in BrE According to Macmillan Dictionary, accommodations (always plural) in AmE can mean the same thing So in BrE and AmE, it's either accommodation or accommodations An accommodation in the news (CNN) seems to be an act of accommodating, I believe
One word for very helpful - English Language Learners Stack Exchange The word accommodating doesn't incorporate the intensifier, though it's a good word Consider that you can say "You have been very accommodating " A word that won't accept an additional intensifier is indispensable It's not exactly the same as helpful, but it might fit some situations
Can I use accommodating as an opposite of dominating? "accommodating" (considerate · friendly · generous · helpful · hospitable · polite · unselfish · obliging ) isn't really the opposite of "dominating domineering" (imperative, imperious, masterful, peremptory, ) By and large, we only use "accommodating" to refer to the senior party in an interaction (who has the power to refuse whatever the junior party wants, but chooses not to
Accommodate vs accommodate for - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "accommodate vs accommodate for" “Accommodate” without “for” is commonly used Adding “for” specifies a reason behind the accommodation In English, both “accommodate” and “accommodate for” can be correct, but they serve different purposes When you want to talk about making room or adjusting something to fit needs, use “accommodate” alone For example: The hotel can
verbs - Is is accommodated in correct? - English Language Learners . . . Yes, your understanding of accommodate is correct For reference the Merriam Webster dictionary defines as: to provide with something desired, needed, or suited to make room for to hold without crowding or inconvenience accommodated is just the past tense of accommodate, so for example: Today: Can you accommodate me in your hotel? Tomorrow: They accommodated me the the hotel As for your
Should I write focus or focuses in the following sentence? You cannot use focus or focuses in that sentence, because it has several other problems You can write something like: Telepathy is not a suitable topic for a science class, which should focus on ___ and ____ (By the way, many scientists would tell you that telepathy is a fine topic to discuss or investigate in a science class, and that science focuses on theories as well as "established
grammar - (A) burden (to on) someone - English Language Learners . . . Either "burden" or "burdens" fits It's a question of how the speaker is thinking of them, and I don't see any reason to choose one over the other, given just that sentence As to the prepositions, saying "They are a burden on me " is a simple statement about how they weigh on me Saying "They are a burden to me " is a statement about how I regard them, that is, what they mean to me The
How does nothing if not mean at the very least; certainly? nothing if not = at the very least; certainly How does the juxtaposition of nothing + if + not produces the above definition on the right? What semantic notions underlie and connect the left-han