copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U. S. 519 (1978) U S Supreme Court Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v NRDC, 435 U S 519 (1978) Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc No 76-419 Argued November 28, 1977 Decided April 3, 1978* 435 U S 519 Syllabus In No 76-419, after extensive hearings before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Licensing Board) and over respondents' objections, the Atomic Energy
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council . . . Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U S 519 (1978), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court cannot impose rulemaking procedures on a federal government agency The federal Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 and an agency's statutory mandate from Congress establish the maximum requirements for an agency's rulemaking (and
U. S. Reports: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U. S. 519 . . . Title U S Reports: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v NRDC, 435 U S 519 (1978) Names Rehnquist, William H (Judge) Supreme Court of the United States (Author) Created Published 1977 Headings - Law - Law Library - Supreme Court - United States - Government Documents - Judicial review and appeals - Licensing and permits - Government
435 U. S. 519 (1978) 98 S. Ct. 1197, 55 L. Ed. 2d 460 v. United States . . . In No 76-419, after extensive hearings before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Licensing Board) and over respondents' objections, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) granted petitioner Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp a license to operate a nuclear power plant, and this ruling was affirmed by the Atomic Safety [98 S Ct 1200] and Licensing Appeal Board (Appeal Board) Subsequently, the
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP. V. NRDC, 435 U. S. 519 (1978) Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v NRDC, 435 U S 519 (1978) the rulemaking proceedings were inadequate, and overturned the rule, and, accordingly, the AEC's determination with respect to the license was also remanded for further proceedings In No 76-528, after examination of a report of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) and extensive hearings, and over respondent
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council . . . Brief Fact Summary This case arose from two separate decisions by the Atomic Energy Commission (Commission) 1) to grant a license to Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp (Petitioner), and 2) to grant a permit to Consumers Power Co (Petitioner) The Natural Resources Defense Council (Respondent) challenged the Commission in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, claiming it employed
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources . . . - Quimbee Get Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc , 435 U S 519 (1978), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee