|
- How to rollback or commit a transaction in SQL Server
The good news is a transaction in SQL Server can span multiple batches (each exec is treated as a separate batch ) You can wrap your EXEC statements in a BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT but you'll need to go a step further and rollback if any errors occur
- sql server - SQL Transaction was deadlocked - Stack Overflow
Sometimes I get this kind of exception on not very busy SQL server: Transaction (Process ID 57) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim Re
- java - How to start a transaction in JDBC? - Stack Overflow
This bring up the question: how do you begin a transaction in JDBC? It's clear how to end a transaction, but not how to begin it If a Connection starts inside in a transaction, how are we supposed to invoke Connection setTransactionIsolation(int) outside of a transaction to avoid implementation-specific behavior?
- Transaction marked as rollback only: How do I find the cause
The status of the transaction is stored in a thread local variable When the spring intercepts methodC and sets the flag as rollback , your transaction is already marked for roll back
- Sql server - log is full due to ACTIVE_TRANSACTION
In my case neither restarting SQL Server nor shrinking the database worked The db was restored from a backup and I think something was wrong with backup itself I ended up detaching the database, removing the LDF file, attaching it removing the expected LDF file row and letting SQL Server to create a new log file It got fixed this way
- sql - Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of . . .
But when I call The second stored procedure as: Exec USPStoredProcName I get the following error: Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements Previous count = 1, current count = 0 I have read the answers in other such questions and am unable to find where exactly the commit count is getting
- The transaction log for the database is full - Stack Overflow
I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration I have no control over the way this is executed Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe
- Correct use of transactions in SQL Server - Stack Overflow
Shouldn't BEGIN TRANSACTION [Tran1] be placed inside TRY? Anyway - very simple and elegant piece of code
|
|
|