|
- sql server - How to use SqlTransaction in C# - Stack Overflow
There is an Update query in progress, the Transaction is started at a higher level on the connection In order to ensure that all server data is in a valid state for the Update, I need to do a couple reads
- How to rollback or commit a transaction in SQL Server
The good news is a transaction in SQL Server can span multiple batches (each exec is treated as a separate batch ) You can wrap your EXEC statements in a BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT but you'll need to go a step further and rollback if any errors occur
- Transaction marked as rollback only: How do I find the cause
The status of the transaction is stored in a thread local variable When the spring intercepts methodC and sets the flag as rollback , your transaction is already marked for roll back
- sql - Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of . . .
But when I call The second stored procedure as: Exec USPStoredProcName I get the following error: Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements Previous count = 1, current count = 0 I have read the answers in other such questions and am unable to find where exactly the commit count is getting
- Sql server - log is full due to ACTIVE_TRANSACTION
In my case neither restarting SQL Server nor shrinking the database worked The db was restored from a backup and I think something was wrong with backup itself I ended up detaching the database, removing the LDF file, attaching it removing the expected LDF file row and letting SQL Server to create a new log file It got fixed this way
- java - How to start a transaction in JDBC? - Stack Overflow
This bring up the question: how do you begin a transaction in JDBC? It's clear how to end a transaction, but not how to begin it If a Connection starts inside in a transaction, how are we supposed to invoke Connection setTransactionIsolation(int) outside of a transaction to avoid implementation-specific behavior?
- TSQL Try Catch within Transaction or vice versa?
END CATCH --COMMIT TRANSACTION SCHEDULEDELETE --Run this if count correct --ROLLBACK TRANSACTION SCHEDULEDELETE --Run this if there is any doubt whatsoever This is my first time writing transaction, is it correct best practice to have the TRY CATCH block inside the transaction or should the transaction be inside the TRY block?
- The transaction log for database is full due to LOG_BACKUP in a . . .
The transaction log for database 'db_name' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP' I searched around and found a lot of related answers like this and this or this but the problem is they suggest running a query on the database
|
|
|