Should I use != or lt; gt; for not equal in T-SQL? - Stack Overflow Yes; Microsoft themselves recommend using <> over != specifically for ANSI compliance, e g in Microsoft Press training kit for 70-461 exam, "Querying Microsoft SQL Server", they say "As an example of when to choose the standard form, T-SQL supports two “not equal to” operators: <> and != The former is standard and the latter is not
SQL asterisk(*) all possible uses - Stack Overflow It is used in sql-server for xml In the code below, aliasing the subquery as ' [*]' means that COLUMN_NAME and DATA_TYPE xml nodes output on the same level as TABLE_SCHEMA and TABLE_NAME
SQL: IF clause within WHERE clause - Stack Overflow Is it possible to use an IF clause within a WHERE clause in MS SQL? Example: WHERE IF IsNumeric(@OrderNumber) = 1 OrderNumber = @OrderNumber ELSE OrderNumber LIKE '%' + @
SQL WITH clause example - Stack Overflow 353 The SQL WITH clause was introduced by Oracle in the Oracle 9i release 2 database The SQL WITH clause allows you to give a sub-query block a name (a process also called sub-query refactoring), which can be referenced in several places within the main SQL query The name assigned to the sub-query is treated as though it was an inline view or
sql - Incorrect syntax near - Stack Overflow I'm trying to run the following fairly simple query in SQL Server Management Studio: SELECT TOP 1000 * FROM master sys procedures as procs left join master sys parameters as params on p