|
- What does atomic mean in programming? - Stack Overflow
In the Effective Java book, it states: The language specification guarantees that reading or writing a variable is atomic unless the variable is of type long or double [JLS, 17 4 7] What do
- c++ - What exactly is std::atomic? - Stack Overflow
Objects of atomic types are the only C++ objects that are free from data races; that is, if one thread writes to an atomic object while another thread reads from it, the behavior is well-defined In addition, accesses to atomic objects may establish inter-thread synchronization and order non-atomic memory accesses as specified by std::memory_order
- Is there a difference between the _Atomic type qualifier and type . . .
Why the standard make that difference? It seems as both designate, in the same way, an atomic type
- When do I really need to use atomic lt;bool gt; instead of bool?
Closed 12 years ago Isn't atomic<bool> redundant because bool is atomic by nature? I don't think it's possible to have a partially modified bool value When do I really need to use atomic<bool> instead of bool?
- atomic operations and atomic transactions - Stack Overflow
Can someone explain to me, whats the difference between atomic operations and atomic transactions? Its seems to me that these two are the same thing Is that correct?
- How to initialize a static std::atomic data member
Since std::atomic_init has been deprecated in C++20, here is a reimplementation which does not raise deprecation warnings, if you for some reason want to keep doing this
- sql - What is atomicity in dbms - Stack Overflow
The definition of atomic is hazy; a value that is atomic in one application could be non-atomic in another For a general guideline, a value is non-atomic if the application deals with only a part of the value Eg: The current Wikipedia article on First NF (Normal Form) section Atomicity actually quotes from the introductory parts above
- Whats the difference between the atomic and nonatomic attributes?
The last two are identical; "atomic" is the default behavior (note that it is not actually a keyword; it is specified only by the absence of nonatomic -- atomic was added as a keyword in recent versions of llvm clang) Assuming that you are @synthesizing the method implementations, atomic vs non-atomic changes the generated code If you are writing your own setter getters, atomic nonatomic
|
|
|