|
- What is the origin of shorthand for with - gt; w ?
It’s also common to see the abbreviation w in real estate or housing descriptions Many descriptions of properties for sale or rent have limited characters, so they use abbreviations: “house w 2-car garage ” You might see the abbreviation for with on official forms or tables of research data that have a limited number of characters
- Usage of p. versus pp. versus pg. to denote page numbers and page . . .
The APA style of referencing, which I have most frequently used, requires that p is used for single page references or citations (Book Title, p 13) while for multiple pages you must cite it as (pp 35-40) So p stands for page, pp stands for pages I have not encountered pg to be used, but I do use it in informal note taking
- Is nr. a correct abbreviation for the word number?
Normally we use 'nr' as an abbreviation of 'near', and 'no' to abbreviate 'number' (from Latin numero) Moreover, unlike AmE, abbreviations do not usually end with a stop if they comprise the first and last letter of the word So in BrE we have and Mr and Dr, in AmE they use Mr and Dr But because the abbreviation 'no' is easily confused with the word 'no', we usually capitalise it with a
- numbers - What are the correct abbreviations for millions, billions and . . .
The only financial specific similar abbreviation I can find is MM for million (financial notation, according to Wikipedia) What's the AP style (or equivalent authority) abbreviation for billion and trillion in a financial context, and where would I find this information?
- Are w o, w , b c common abbreviations in the US?
English writing often uses slashes to form two-letter abbreviations, plus the one-letter w – some examples, roughly in order of frequency: I O – “input output” w – “with” c o – “care of” A C – “air conditioning” w o – “without” R C – “remote control” b c – “because” Like most abbreviations, these are less common in formal writing, although some of
- abbreviations - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
This then creates a conflict between the abbreviation no meaning number (from French nombre) and № (from the Latin numero) 1 Back to the question - Since it is common to use the abbreviation ' no ' to mean number of, particularly in technical circumstances such as yours, it seems perfectly appropriate to abbreviate it as you have
- differences - Versus versus vs. in writing - English Language . . .
In writing, when should one use the abbreviation vs as opposed to the full versus? This abbreviation seems to have special status from common usage What is the origin of that, and in what writing
- What is the correct abbreviation for the word numbers?
The abbreviation for number is no nos Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no as the abbreviation for number
|
|
|