|
- word choice - considered as vs considered to be - English Language . . .
Both “considered to be” and “considered as” are incorrect The words “as” or “to be”, when used after the word “considered” are nearly always superfluous, and therefore unnecessary The sentence in your example above (without all of the ellipses, of course) is already structured correctly Over the past several years, I have noticed both “considered to be” and
- subjunctives - Is considered always followed by as? - English . . .
I have the following idea: The reconstruction of object models is performed using a graph matching approach, which is considered a corner fixing dilemma The reconstruction of object mode
- grammaticality - Considered vs Considered as - English Language . . .
The theory: Considered + object Used when the subject should be just another name for something Literally, that the object is the subject He should be considered our leader since he makes all the decisions = He is our leader Considered + as + object Used when the object can be used to replace the subject Indoor soccer should be considered as an alternative to outdoor soccer in winter
- What is the difference between girl, lady, and woman?
girl can be used in almost any situation, and just refers to a female of any age, however, it's more common to use the term for females under 30 lady can be used in almost any situation, and is more respectful in my opinion There is a common term called "lady like" , which implies that ladies act like females should They are caring, pleasant, have good manners, etc woman is a tricky one
- subject verb agreement - Is staff singular or plural? - English . . .
Here you can see the usage in a dictionary: Meaning of staff in English Contents staff noun UK stɑːf US stæf staff noun (PEOPLE) A2 [ S, + sing pl verb ] the group of people who work for an organization: There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase There are over a hundred staff in the company He is on
- grammar - Carefully considering vs. carefully consider - English . . .
I have a sentence like: We recommend carefully consider these variations Is the sentence grammatically correct? Or is using considering instead of consider better?
- grammar - How should similes be treated considered grammatically . . .
Should similes, when it comes to grammar, be treated considered as subordinating conjunctions of comparison (e g just as, though, etc )? And therefore, they shouldn't be preceded by a comma (unlike coordinating conjunctions when they introduce an independent clause)?
- Can in front of be considered as: noun preceded and followed by . . .
Front is a noun, but the phrase in front of can only be adverbial, describing the Union leader's position relative to the crowd I see no difference between that and Bob was in front of me
|
|
|