|
- Why a G. O. P. Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure
Why a G O P Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure The Republicans’ big bill would require most states to build technology systems quickly and with little funding
- Why Medicaid Is Failing—And What Republicans Must Do About It - Forbes
Democrats attack GOP plans to curb Medicaid spending growth, but the truth is Medicaid is broken Urgent reforms are needed to fix the system now
- The GOP’s Big Medicaid Idea Was Tried Before—And Failed Badly
“A tight timeline for implementation of Medicaid work requirements could mean fewer systems are in place to automatically verify people’s work status, and the outreach to inform enrollees of their reporting responsibilities may not have ramped up,” Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the health research organization KFF, told me
- What will Trumps big, beautiful bill do to Medicaid and SNAP?
Trump's megabill cuts around $600 billion in Medicaid About 11 million people could lose their coverage over 10 years, according to the CBO Here are other effects
- Medicaid Work Requirements Could Put 36 Million People at Risk of . . .
We estimate that 36 million Medicaid adult enrollees would be at risk of losing health coverage under the recent proposals, representing 44 percent of all Medicaid enrollees Of the 36 million adults at risk, 20 million are enrolled through the ACA Medicaid expansion, and 16 million are enrolled through non-expansion adult eligibility pathways
- Why a G. O. P. Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure
Continue reading Why a G O P Medicaid Requirement Could Set States Up for Failure at New York Times Read Article Share Article
- Medicaid and CHIP Cuts in the House-Passed Reconciliation Bill . . .
Bipartisan, Sound Medicaid and CHIP Provisions While constituting only a very small portion of the House-passed reconciliation bill’s Medicaid and CHIP provisions, there are several modest provisions that have previously received strong bipartisan support and are generally sound policy
|
|
|