- Slate Star Codex
Support Slate Star Codex on Patreon I have a day job and SSC gets free hosting, so don't feel pressured to contribute But extra cash helps pay for contest prizes, meetup expenses, and me spending extra time blogging instead of working
- Top Posts - Slate Star Codex
Slate Star Codex Political Spectrum Quiz, which is exactly what it says on the tin
- About Top Posts - Slate Star Codex
Welcome to Slate Star Codex, a blog about science, medicine, philosophy, politics, and futurism (there’s also one post about hallucinatory cactus-people, but it’s not representative) SSC is the project of Scott Alexander, a psychiatrist on the US West Coast
- Adderall Risks: Much More Than You Wanted To Know - Slate Star Codex
I asked a question on the Slate Star Codex survey about this People on Adderall more than one month were asked to tell me whether they had no tolerance problems, some tolerance requiring dose escalation, or high tolerance that made the medications stop working entirely
- Archives - Slate Star Codex
07 05 - The Craft And The Codex 07 04 - Open Thread 105 25 07 03 - SSC Journal Club: Dissolving The Fermi Paradox 07 01 - OT105: Ethelthread The Unthready 03 08 - The Slate Star Codex Political Spectrum Quiz 03 06 - Links For March 2014 03 04 - Book Review: The Perfect Health Diet
- Beware Isolated Demands For Rigor - Slate Star Codex
Exactly Eliezer thinks of the social process of science as an pragmatic approximation to Bayesian reasoning, much like a man might calculate the physics of a bullet using Newtonian mechanics even though he knows that Einsteinian mechanics are more accurate
- SSRIs: An Update - Slate Star Codex
Support Slate Star Codex on Patreon I have a day job and SSC gets free hosting, so don't feel pressured to contribute But extra cash helps pay for contest prizes, meetup expenses, and me spending extra time blogging instead of working
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The . . . - Slate Star Codex
Yes, I do realise that there are KJV-Only and Inerrantist-types who probably do go “If the Scriptures say it’s a fish, then it’s a fish and nothing else”, but my point, such as it was, is that the people on the opposite side who think that “Hah, well, whales are not fish, so there!” is a knock-down argument are just as fixated on the wrong point
|