|
- What is nothing? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
5 Krauss' definition of nothing is the result of the allergy contemporary physicists get from philosophy; the philosopher David Albert posted a crushing criticism of the book in response and started a terrible fight: Where, for starters, are the laws of quantum mechanics themselves supposed to have come from?
- How can something come from nothing? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
The question should be 'How can something come out of nothing' not 'Why cannot something come out of nothing' Stephen Hawkings has recently argued as to how the universe can come out of nothing, but to my mind his argument is rather circular and it's not provable
- Nothingness cannot be. Does that imply something must be?
Nothingness doesn't be, that's the definition of nothingness (at least in this question) that what is not, does not exist If there was no Universe, if there was nothing, nothingness would be, tha
- What happens when nothing happens? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
Nothing is the negation of logical categories, defined by context 'I'm doing nothing' would involve many biological processes, but a specific contextually relevant negation of say, intentional acts or activities of certain kinds, as given by implicit cues 'Happening' implies something interacting, changing
- Is there a philosophy which argues that nothing exists?
Is or was there a philosophy which examines a hypothesis that in fact nothing "exists" except maybe questions? I know there are philosophies that state that reality is a simulation etc but I mean
- If all life will be annihilated, then why does anything matter?
everything is meaningless even our being this leaves one question why does anything matter in life: here is my answer nothing matter in life u can do anything u want unless u dont hurt others which leads to u being punished if u alright with that then u can go do anything but u still got the sense of enjoyment in ur DNA so might as well just go
- What is the literal meaning of The only thing that I know is that I . . .
If they knew nothing, then they obviously wouldn't have known that they know the fact that they do not know anything at all Is this a self-contradicting statement, which meaning is the logical one? It looks like the statement is true AND false at the same time I have never taken any philosophy classes so forgive my ineptness but I thought I'd
- logic - Can something be nothing? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
Yet even though nothing is something, something is something in itself, and therefore can not be nothing This could also apply to "Can something be anything (or everything)?"
|
|
|