- What is a monad? - Stack Overflow
Here the monad-pattern is used to avoid repetitive code This is similar to how some other languages use macros to simplify syntax, although macros achieve the same goal in a very different way Note that it is the combination of the monad pattern and the monad-friendly syntax in Haskell which result in the cleaner code
- What is it that Leibniz calls a “Monad”?
Also, every monad has a dedicated corpus, a body which is itself assembled from parts, which themselves have their dedicated monads, lower in the hierarchy Only the monas monadum exists without one All in all, this is a very difficult topic I hope I was of any help, and did not add to your confusion
- haskell - A monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors . . .
In summary, any monad is by definition an endofunctor, hence an object in the category of endofunctors, where the monadic join and return operators satisfy the definition of a monoid in that particular (strict) monoidal category
- functional programming - Monad interface in C++ - Stack Overflow
Monad<DummyType2>>, std::is_same<constructor_return_t<Monad, DummyType>, Monad<DummyType>>> {}; Note that even though we generally expect the type constructor to take a single type T as an argument, I've used a variadic template template parameter to account for default allocators typically used in STL containers
- What is the purpose of the reader monad? - Stack Overflow
The reader monad is so complex and seems to be useless In an imperative language like Java or C++, there is no equivalent concept for the reader monad, if I am not mistaken Can you give me a sim
- functional programming - What is a monad for someone who doesnt want . . .
The thing is, most programming languages don't have a sufficiently powerful type system to really express the idea of monads, namely, they don't support higher-kinded polymorphism So, for explaining monads, a quick intro to Haskell syntax is the easiest way The alternative is to introduce it without any programming language at all, using only math syntax – but that doesn't make it easier
|