|
- members members members area | WordReference Forums
One is not necessarily correct over the others - member's area = an area of a member, belonging to a member - members' area = an area of members, belonging to more than one member - members area = an area for members That is exactly the problem I have been having so far
- A group of people + is are ? | WordReference Forums
Collecting phrases like a number of or a pair of can make it hard to choose between is and are Which verb do you use when you’re talking about a number of people? On one hand, number is singular, which calls for is But people is plural, which calls for are Typically, it’s best to use are with a number of Correct A number of people are concerned about the lack of progress Incorrect A
- Belong to vs. work at vs. a member of - WordReference Forums
1) Do you belong to HR unit? 2) Do you work at HR unit? 3) Are you a member of HR unit? If I ask a colleague in my company about what unit is he or she working at, are these phrases all correct? If so, which is best and most polite? Thank you!
- share to or share with - WordReference Forums
Hi I'd like to write that I have provided all partners with the link (Internet) The sentence is: I have shared the link with to all partners Which one is correct to use in this sentence: with or to? Thank you in advance for your help
- go to hospital go to the hospital - WordReference Forums
The first is somewhat of a set phrase and means much the same as "go to a hospital", in other words, no particular hospital, but the subject requires hospitalisation "Go to the hospital" is sometimes used in the exact same way as the above It also can mean going to a specific hospital, hence the use of the definite article => I broke my leg playing football and had to go to hospital I went
- unpaid vs not paid - WordReference Forums
The meaning is the same But "unpaid" is an adjective "Not paid" is a phrase You can use that phrase in many places, but not in this one It is not correct grammar: His last company owes millions in not paid taxes
- is or has deceased - WordReference Forums
No "Deceased" is an adjective; "decease" is not generally used as a verb You might find it in dictionaries, but OED, for example, has no examples later than the eighteenth century (although it does not mark it as obsolete or archaic) Use "died" instead
- Before was was was，was was is - WordReference Forums
Robby Zhu Senior Member China - Mandarin Jun 7, 2023 #1 Greetings, 1 Before was was was, was was is 2 Before was is was, was was is Which one do you think makes more sense? I think the second, although the first gets more hits on Google, because "was" now comes as "was", so the tense should be present
|
|
|