|
- How to find the identifier value displayed on your PC for Bitlocker . . .
The printout for the Bitlocker recovery key says to match the identifier provided with "the identifier value displayed on your PC" Where is this identifier value displayed? If I go to Settings >
- where to find the identifier value displayed on my PC?
I had the same question regarding the, " compare the start of the following identifier with the identifier value displayed on your PC " I came to the conclusion the above text is really giving you instructions to be carried out during the Recovery Process
- PLS-00201 - identifier must be declared - Stack Overflow
PLS-00201 - identifier must be declared Asked 11 years, 2 months ago Modified 8 years ago Viewed 371k times
- Java: Identifier expected - Stack Overflow
Java: Identifier expected Asked 13 years, 1 month ago Modified 3 years, 9 months ago Viewed 577k times
- ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified . . .
ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified I am able to use SQLPLUS from the command line to connect to the database, and tnsping returns successfully, but I can't figure out why PLSQL Developer will not work - it's using the right tnsnames ora file, and the connection string in there is correct because it's the same one
- What is a multi-part identifier and why cant it be bound?
A multipart identifier is any description of a field or table that contains multiple parts - for instance MyTable SomeRow - if it can't be bound that means there's something wrong with it - either you've got a simple typo, or a confusion between table and column It can also be caused by using reserved words in your table or field names and not surrounding them with [] It can also be caused
- variables - C++ identifier is undefined - Stack Overflow
C++ identifier is undefined Asked 5 years, 9 months ago Modified 1 year, 10 months ago Viewed 203k times
- c++ - Expected an identifier - Stack Overflow
With respect to expecting an identifier error, the operator [ ] requires a variable in front of it, so arr[1] means return the second object in array (or container) arr The solution is to use the correct syntax for list-initialization, which is a form of uniform initialization (do not confuse with aggregate initialization, which is for aggregates
|
|
|