|
- Help me put these enormous numbers in order: googol, googol-plex-bang . . .
googol stack bang stack bang googol bang bang stack plex stack and so on… Consider the collection of all numbers that can be named in this scheme, by a term starting with googol and having finitely many adjectival operands: bang, stack, plex, in any finite pattern, repetitions allowed
- What is larger? Grahams number or Googolplexian?
3 See YouTube or wikipedia for the defination of Graham's number A Googol is defined as $10^ {100}$ A Googolplex is defined as $10^ {\text {Googol}}$ A Googolplexian is defined as $10^ {\text {Googolplex}}$ Intuitively, it seems to me that Graham's number is larger (maybe because of it's complex definition) Can anybody prove this?
- Is Rayos number really that big? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
the smallest positive integer bigger than any finite positive integer named by an expression in the language of first order set theory with a googol symbols or less So while there are only approximately $ (10^ {100})^ { (10^ {100})}$ possible expressions, and only a very small fraction of them actually name a number, Rayo's number can be very
- How to Calculate the Disk Space Required to Store Googolplex?
Given the googolplex number and that 1 gigabyte = 1 073 741 824 bytes How would I calculate the amount of disk space required to store the googolplex number?
- Googol and Googolplex Question(Australian Maths Competition)
Googol and Googolplex Question (Australian Maths Competition) Ask Question Asked 8 years, 3 months ago Modified 6 years, 3 months ago
- Computing a very large number - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Millennia is a short and cozy term here We're talking about a something like a googol googol googol googol googols times the age of the universe (In other words, your program can't count that long on any real hardware before the heat death of the universe cuts off the power; I don't think the universe would have room for the stupendous amounts of entropy that would be produced by even a
- Grahams number - Mathematics Stack Exchange
In order to understand how big Graham's number really is, I tried to come up with the largest number I could understand and then I tried to compare it with Graham's number Coming up with the numbe
- Which is bigger: a googolplex or $10^ {100!}$ [closed]
Therefore $10^ {100!}\gt10^\text {googol}=\text {googolplex}$ (Remark: The " $\times$ " symbol's role here is purely visual, to put a little extra separation between things that are treated differently
|
|
|