|
- The Supreme Court just dealt a harsh blow to religious pluralism . . .
On Friday, June 27, the U S Supreme Court handed down its 6-3 ruling in Mahmoud v Taylor Far-right Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, stressing that religious parents should be
- How Religious Pluralism Lost at the Supreme Court
How Religious Pluralism Lost at the Supreme Court The conservative justices’ ruling in a case involving LGBTQ-themed books in public schools is likely to benefit larger religious groups and
- Supreme Court handed down major religious liberty wins this term
As the Supreme Court ends its 2024-2025 term, the justices’ rulings offered major wins for religious liberty activists in cases involving the religious rights of both organizations and individuals
- When inclusion becomes compulsion: Mahmoud v. Taylor, pluralism, and . . .
A Maryland district court and the U S Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled against them, but the Supreme Court reversed Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito grounded the decision in a familiar source: the court’s 1972 ruling in Wisconsin v
- Supreme Court flooded with prayers for relief from groups eager to . . .
Religious interest groups are queuing up a series of high-profile appeals at the Supreme Court this fall that could further tear down the wall separating church and state, seeking to take
- Supreme Court Issues Blow to Civil Rights Religious Pluralism
Today, the Supreme Court issued a decision in 303 Creative v Elenis that rolls back the civil rights protections that have shielded religious minorities and other groups from discrimination in the public marketplace for over fifty years
- Parents may pull their children from classes that offend their religion . . .
The ruling said parents could choose to have their children temporarily removed from classes with lessons and books that offend their religous beliefs The court’s three liberals dissented
- Pivotal Term for Faith and Family at the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court’s 2025 term concluded with four decisions that collectively represent significant victories for religious liberty, parental rights, and traditional moral frameworks All four cases were decided 6–3 in favor of positions advocated by Christian legal organizations, establishing precedents that protect crucial rights and fundamental religious freedoms Here’s what you
|
|
|