|
- sbctl verify - invalid pe header · Issue #398 · Foxboron sbctl - GitHub
Hello, After a classic setup : reboot --firmware-setup, create-keys, sbctl enroll-keys, sign I received invalid pe header after
- Sbctl verify invalid PE header error - Manjaro Linux Forum
After the latest Manjaro update, I get numerous errors like this when running sbctl verify: failed to verify file boot amd-ucode img: boot amd-ucode img: invalid pe header
- Cant boot in secure boot mode even after signing files with sbctl - Reddit
Can I make something so I can fix the process through sbctl? Or should I use one of the other methods on the wiki? In the case of the second one is it safe to remove sbctl? It it is, using pacman -R sbctl is enough or should I use other command? Edit1: I also use Nvidia proprietary driver, could be it?
- Secure boot with sbctl returning a bunch of unrecognized PEs Newbie . . .
When I try to list all signed files or doing sbctl verify, it returns that a bunch of random files from grub and etc have invalid PE headers or are not recognized Even png if you look at the entire thing Running "sbctl verify" returns this (it always returns other files that have no connection whatsoever to secure boot):
- sbctl verify shows files that are not in the database after an update . . .
will fix be also for ignoring non * efi files? or you want scan all files, but non-PE without output error warning? sbctl verify tries to parse all files in the ESP
- Secure Boot on Linux with sbctl - kris. sh
Finalizing After rebooting with secure boot enabled, you can verify everything is correct by running sbctl status, and making sure that Setup Mode is disabled and Secure Boot is enabled like so: If everything looks good, you’re all set Do remember to sign files again if necessary after system updates
- [SOLVED] sbctl setup --migrate doesnt work System Administration . . .
I've dug a bit deeper into my setup and have found some stuff I vaguely remember doing myself -- either by copying from the Wiki, or fruits of my own genius See below Either way, that seems to take care of the signing business without sbctl being involved I wonder why sbctl starts caring all of a sudden, and from where the binary gets called
- `sbctl verify` returns `failed to find EFI system partition` even . . .
When sbctl tries to find valid mount points it assumes the fstype to be vfat and pttype to be gpt with parttype c12a7328-f81f-11d2-ba4b-00a0c93ec93b, on one of three mountpoints: boot, efi and boot efi
|
|
|