|
- Pentagon says its investigating Sen. Mark Kelly | AP News
The Pentagon says that it is investigating Democratic Sen Mark Kelly of Arizona for possible breaches of military law after Kelly joined a handful of other lawmakers in a video that called for U S troops to refuse unlawful orders
- Pentagon says its investigating Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly after video . . .
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon says that it is investigating Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona for possible breaches of military law after Kelly joined a handful of other lawmakers in a
- Pentagon says its investigating Sen. Mark Kelly for breach of military . . .
The Pentagon indicated that it's investigating Democratic Sen Mark Kelly of Arizona, a former U S Navy Captain, after he was among a group of lawmakers to release a video calling on
- Hegseth Threatens Senator Mark Kelly With Inquiry for ‘Seditious’ Video . . .
The defense secretary called the senator’s remarks urging troops not to follow illegal orders “despicable, reckless, and false ” By Greg Jaffe Reporting from Washington The Pentagon said on
- Pentagon to investigate Sen. Mark Kelly for anti-Trump video
The Pentagon on Monday announced it is investigating Sen Mark Kelly, a critic of President Donald Trump and Navy veteran, after he and fellow Democrats advised troops not to follow illegal orders
- Pentagon investigates Sen. Mark Kelly for telling troops to refuse . . .
The Pentagon says it's opening an investigation into Arizona Sen Mark Kelly in the wake of a video of Democratic lawmakers urging servicemembers not to comply with 'illegal orders " The Trump
- Sen. Mark Kelly under investigation by Pentagon - USA TODAY
The Pentagon said it is reviewing whether Sen Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, broke military law by urging troops to refuse unlawful orders
- Pentagon threatens to recall Sen. Mark Kelly to military service in . . .
The Pentagon said Monday that it is investigating Democratic Sen Mark Kelly, a retired US Navy captain, in light of “serious allegations of misconduct” the department has received against him
|
|
|