|
- differences - abundant in vs abundant with - English Language . . .
I am curious as to whether abundant in is a more correct usage than abundant with? For example, the sentence: "The mail room is abundant in letters" seems to have the same meaning when compared to
- Differences between abundant, sufficient, and enough?
Abundant implies that there is more than enough and greater than merely sufficient Both sufficient and enough imply that the quantity satisfies the need and don't necessarily provide any more information
- How to describe a lot of experience in a formal way?
1 Abundant, considerable or extensive would fit Depending on the nuance you are looking for you might want wide-ranging or indepth But there are a lot of possiblities This thesaurus suggests 169 synonyms including ample experience, long-standing experience, significant expertise The list goes on!
- Which word can I use for abundant light?
Which word can I use to describe too much light, i e , when I have switched on 3 bulbs while there was a need for only 1 bulb?
- What word do we use to say that something is so easily available or . . .
I would suggest abundant existing or available in large quantities; plentiful As you can see, the definition from Oxford Dictionaries shows that abundant encompasses what you want to say in one word It is applicable to "things" like potatoes and gives the impression that they are found everywhere
- Is there one word for higher quality and volume?
Use abundant (overabundant) to describe something that exists in large amounts that are more than what's needed Near synonyms are plentiful, emphasizing "large amounts," and ample, emphasizing "more than enough "Our oceans provide sustenance galore " galore Galore means there’s so much that it’s unbelievable The word is an example of a postpositive adjective, which means it comes after
- Rich in vs. Rich with - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
The free dictionary provides two definitions for "rich with" and "rich in" rich with: having a lot of something; abundant in something rich in: having valuable resources, characteristics, traditions, or history It seems like the differences between the two definitions is rather subtle My understanding is the following
- More advanced way to describe a country has many resources
My question is: Instead of "this country has many resources", what can I say? This country is abundant in many resources?
|
|
|