|
- APFS or MacOS Extended for HDD? - MacRumors Forums
In term of reliability (e g resistance to corruption), APFS is more robust Time Machine with APFS destination is faster as well as being much more robust This is for macOS 11 and 12 APFS is more flexible No need to worry about partition sizes - just create a single APFS partition container and create multiple volumes inside it
- How to enlarge a APFS container with free space before it?
I should point out that since the free space shown in your question is larger than the current APFS partition, you could instead do the following as outlined This would be safer, since the original APFS partition would remain unchanged until a successful copy was achieved Create an APFS partition identical in size to the current APFS partition
- APFS or Mac OS extended for external HDD - MacRumors Forums
For example, multiple APFS volumes sharing a single container partition Performance: Time Machine is much quicker on APFS File copies between folders on the same APFS disk is almost instantaneous and doesn't take up disk space (due to 'clones') Otherwise (e g for media storage) I have not noticed any difference between HFS+ and APFS
- APFS with external hard drives (non SSD) - Ask Different
When using a hard drive just to store files, APFS or APFS (Encrypted) could also be used The main advantage to APFS is more APFS volumes can be easily added or removed In your case, open the Disk Utility Press the ⌘+2 key combination Highlight the external drive Select the Erase button and choose the format and scheme given below Note
- APFS ROM Patcher - MacRumors Forums
Besides all the APFS workarounds, I finally came to the conclusion that my maxed out cMP3,1 just isn't cutting it with some CPU-hungry virtual instruments I'm using So I've decided to invest in a souped up Mac Pro 5,1 that will tide me over for a couple of years or until I can afford an M1 based Mac Pro
- Anybody tried APFS for Windows by Paragon? - MacRumors Forums
It might not be representative, but my Windows 10 system that was stable for 5 years crashed for the first time ever after installing Paragon APFS and accessing a USB APFS drive So at the very least, make sure you have a proper backup before trying such invasive software
- Kernel support for HFS+ or APFS - Unix Linux Stack Exchange
What is the current status for the Linux kernel's support for APFS or HFS+ (filesystems used by MacOS)? Does it support write, journaling etc? I saw Is an Apple File System (APFS) driver for linux available or in progress? but the responses there mostly deals with FUSE-solutions I am, for performance reasons¹, interested in kernel based
- APFS (ENCRYPTED) DRIVE WONT MOUNT AND HOW TO FIX IT
It seems APFS is not designed for HHD and probably never would do, but they removed HFS+ Encrypted from macOS I dont know where is the problem here, but we didnt got so many errors years ago, APFS, Apple Silicon and new macOS releases are new added elements in the equation, so one of them should be the culprit
|
|
|