|
- How does the regular expression (aa)+\1 match aaaaaa?
Can anyone explain the process that a regular expression engine matches (aa)+\1 against aaaaaa? I know there is a process called backtracking when you use + or * but I'm not sure how it works in this example
- American - Airline Pilot Central Forums
American### It is against the APC Forum Rules to advocate any labor action which is not authorized by the RLA NMB This applies to ANY wildcat actions, including slowdown, work-to-rules, withdrawal of enthusiasm (WOE), sickouts, etc It is irrelevant whether the union itself has anything to do with the action Major unions have lost court cases and in one instance suffered severe financial
- AA loses ORD gate lawsuit hires DAL exec
American - AA loses ORD gate lawsuit hires DAL exec - American Airlines loses bid to block O'Hare gate redistribution A federal judge has sided with United and the City of Chicago in their dispute with American over gate allocations at Chicago O'Hare
- regex - Why does a*a match aaa? - Stack Overflow
It does initially attempt to match the entire string, but repetition will backtrack if a match fails After the a* initially matching the entire string, the regex tries to match the next token, the single a This fails, so then the a* backtracks back a character (so that it only matches aa rather than aaa) This time, the last token, the single a, is fulfilled, so a match is found Greedyness
- Regular expression that doesnt contain certain string
But i have problem with groups wrapped by aa, where I'd need something like aa([^aa]*)aa which doesn't work, and I can't use the first one like aa([^a]*)aa , because it would end on first occurence of a, which I don't want Generally, is there any way, how to say not contains string in the same way that I can say not contains character with
- Things must be bad at AA - Airline Pilot Central Forums
Are things that bad at AA that your tool bag Garrett is filming himself in the flight deck while hawking personal care products … how has he not gotten fired yet?
- AA vs SWA CJO - Page 14 - Airline Pilot Central Forums
Major - AA vs SWA CJO - Coming back to this thread to see what y'all think these days I've got 35 years left and would move to base at either WN or AA I think both are great places to work but I'm leaning AA for the seniority gain and long term career options based on the current state of the airlines (Yes I've heard
- AA vs SWA CJO - Page 16 - Airline Pilot Central Forums
Major - AA vs SWA CJO - Originally Posted by Freds Ex Okay… I’d like to see the average earnings per day worked of a group of hustling legacy FOs at say 80% seat seniority vs a group of hustling SWA FOs at the same seat seniority
|
|
|