|
- Must @ and %40 be treated equivalently in URL paths?
The URI standard is STD 66, which currently maps to RFC 3986 (which updates RFC 1738) The section 6 2 2 2 Percent-Encoding Normalization defines how to normalize percent-encoded URIs to compare them for equivalence (after uppercasing hexadecimal digits A - F, as defined by 6 2 2 1 Case Normalization) It says: […] some URI producers percent-encode octets that do not require percent
- encoding - %40 converted into @ on Get - Stack Overflow
%40 converted into @ on Get Asked 12 years, 5 months ago Modified 7 years, 4 months ago Viewed 14k times
- How to resolve NET MAUI workload version mismatch?
Continue to help good content that is interesting, well-researched, and useful, rise to the top! To gain full voting privileges,
- How do I fix the error Named Pipes Provider, error 40 - Stack Overflow
Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server I tried using the local IP address to connect as well as a public one I've tried: Yes, the site can communicate with the server Named pipes TCP is enabled Remote connections are allowed Windows Firewall is off Created an exception for port 1433 in Windows Firewall
- Vulnerabilities in spring-webmvc-5. 3. 39 to 5. 3. 40 - Stack Overflow
Discussion on vulnerabilities in specific versions of spring-webmvc and potential solutions provided by the community
- 403 Forbidden vs 401 Unauthorized HTTP responses - Stack Overflow
I don't remember how many times me and my colleagues have come back to stackoverflow for this question Maybe HTTP standards should consider modifying the names or descriptions for 401 and 403
- SQL-Server: The backup set holds a backup of a database other than the . . .
The highly voted answer below is a sledgehammer to crack a nut The problem is most likely that you haven't selected the "Overwrite the existing database (WITH REPLACE)" option in the Restore > Options window I had this problem from command line using WITH MOVE, and was fixed by using WITH REPLACE, MOVE
- Solving sslv3 alert handshake failure when trying to use a client . . .
Not a definite answer but too much to fit in comments: I hypothesize they gave you a cert that either has a wrong issuer (although their server could use a more specific alert code for that) or a wrong subject We know the cert matches your privatekey -- because both curl and openssl client paired them without complaining about a mismatch; but we don't actually know it matches their desired CA
|
|
|