- Why are there such massive differences between sites that give builds . . .
Lolalytics is the one claimed to be closest to riot data that was u gg Regardless, Lolalytics and u gg are fairly similar Lolalytics has slightly higher winrates overall for champs generally because of how it collects data, but other than that the two sites are both interchangable enough
- Which site can you trust more with information? op. gg, u. gg, or lolalytics?
Even setting the lane and rank to the same, I picked a champion and found a 47% WR on op gg, a 51% WR on lolalytics, and a 53% WR on u gg, for example And the runes were also different So which gives more reliable data? Or, how do they take and present data differently?
- U. gg or lolalytics : r leagueoflegends - Reddit
Lolalytics is technically more accurate while being harder to understand for the average player U gg like most stat websites normalize winrate based on rank, so gold players win 50% of the time and so do challenger players But in reality that's false, Challenger players win way more, and iron players win incredibly low amount of games
- Spreading Awareness: LoLalytics Winrate Data Can be Misleading
LoLalytics is also, however, the only stat site which deviates from basic widely used conventions in their sampling methods I just wanted to spread awareness about this, since I've seen so many friends, youtubers, and streamers get the wrong idea about a champion's winrate after checking LoLalytics
- Lolalytics Analysis : r SamiraMains - Reddit
Based on the data on Lolalytics, a lot of people are building Samira incorrectly To start, I'm using the winrate data on Lolalytics for games in…
- How accurate is Lolalytics, u. gg, op. gg etc : r leagueoflegends
The most important thing is understanding how they arrive at the numbers they present For example, op gg only uses matches on the South Korean server for its data Lolalytics does champions by the rank of the individual player while most other sites come up with an average rank of each match to classify it as (which means the average win rate for a given rank is not always 50% across all champs)
- Lolalytics has an exclusive feature that is better than what any . . .
411 votes, 44 comments trueLolalytics has an exclusive feature that is better than what any alternative site provides
- Which Lol site has the most accurate statistics - Reddit
Lolalytics is the most extensive, but also has some confusing quirks with normalization, and due to it being extensive has lots of interesting but low sample size data you always need to take with a grain of salt
|