- ENI, S. p. A. and Snamprogetti Netherlands, B. V. - SEC. gov
Snamprogetti has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ and agreed to pay a criminal penalty of $240 million The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the U S Department of Justice, Fraud Section; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and foreign authorities in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas
- Snamprogetti (SAIPEN)-NLNG BRIBERY SCANDAL case
According to a Press Release by the ENI company, as part of its subsidiary Snamprogetti Netherlands BV's settlement and non-prosecution agreement with the Nigerian authorities, Snamprogetti agreed to the payment of a criminal penalty of $30 million and of $2 5 million as reimbursement for legal costs and expenses incurred by the Nigerian
- As US-style corporate leniency deals for bribery and corruption go . . .
Defenders of deferred prosecution and other negotiated settlements say they save governments the time and expense of collecting evidence needed to take rich companies to trial, while still holding them accountable for their misdeeds
- SEC v. ENI, S. p. A. and Snamprogetti Netherlands B. V. (S. D. Tex. 2010)
In its complaint, the SEC alleged that Snamprogetti violated the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions, and that both Snamprogetti and ENI violated the books-and-records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA
- Deferred prosecution agreements as miscarriage of justice: An . . .
This article argues that deferred prosecution agreements violate basic principles of justice The research suggests that serious fraud offices and other public bodies need to be restored to enable complete criminal prosecution when there are suspicions of corporate wrongdoing
- ENI and Snamprogetti settle criminal and civil charges . . . - Lexology
KBR also entered into a deferred prosecution agreement and was fined $402 million, placed on three years organizational probation, and required to retain an independent monitor for the same
- 2020 YEAR-END UPDATE ON CORPORATE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS AND . . .
To Our Clients and Friends: The world changed significantly in 2020 Amid the uncertainty wrought by COVID-19, however, the use of corporate non-prosecution agreements (“NPAs”) and deferred prosecution agreements (“DPAs”) by the U S Department of Justice (“DOJ”) proved to be a constant [1]
- Prosecution Deferred, Prosecution Exempt: On the Interests of (In . . .
This agreement covered 12 counts of conspiracy to corrupt, failure to prevent bribery, and false accounting with the associated conduct spanning a 24-year period, occurring in seven jurisdictions (Indonesia, Thailand, India, Russia, Nigeria, China and Malaysia), and involving multiple sales contracts for its aero engines, energy systems and
|