|
- Murthy v. Missouri - Wikipedia
On July 4, 2023, Judge Terry A Doughty issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting several agencies and members of the Biden administration from contacting social media services to request the blocking of material, with exceptions for material involving illegal activity
- 23-411 Murthy v. Missouri (06 26 2024)
The States, Missouri and Louisiana, claim that the platforms have suppressed the speech of state entities and officials, as well as their citizens’ speech Though the platforms restricted the plaintiffs’ content, the plaintiffs maintain that the Federal Government was behind it
- Murthy v. Missouri | Oyez
Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court The Court concluded that the petitioners lacked standing for two main reasons: First, the plaintiffs failed to establish a clear causal link between their past social media restrictions and the actions of the government defendants
- Murthy v. Missouri - SCOTUSblog
Holding: Respondents, two states and five individual social media users who sued executive branch officials and agencies, alleging that the government pressured the platforms to censor their speech in violation of the First Amendment, lack Article III standing to seek an injunction
- Murthy v. Missouri, 603 U. S. ___ (2024) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
Murthy v Missouri: Plaintiffs who argued that the federal government pressured social media platforms to censor their speech in violation of the First Amendment did not have standing to seek an injunction
- Murthy v. Missouri: The First Amendment and Government Influence on . . .
Murthy v Missouri concerned whether the federal government’s involvement in influencing content moderation choices at private social media companies, such as Facebook, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter), violated the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause 1
- Harvard Law expert explains Supreme Court First Amendment case Murthy v . . .
On March 18, the justices will hear oral arguments in a case, Murthy v Missouri, in which the two states and several individuals claim that federal officials violated the First Amendment in their efforts to “help” social media companies combat mis- and disinformation about COVID-19 and other matters
- Murthy v. Missouri | Supreme Court Bulletin | US Law | LII Legal . . .
Five individuals and two states (collectively “Missouri”) who had their content removed by the social media platforms sued the government officials in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana for violating their First Amendment rights
|
|
|