|
- The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders
- The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile . . . - Springer
As reflected in this summary effect, programs for juvenile offenders are likely to reduce recidivism and are an important part of offender rehabilitation, reducing recidivism, and enhancing public safety
- Final Exam: The 40-Year Debate on What Works for Juvenile . . . - Studocu
This meta-review examines the effectiveness of intervention programs in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders, synthesizing findings from four decades of
- Lacee Nicole Pappas - Google Scholar
Lacee Nicole Pappas University of California, Irvine Verified email at uci edu Articles 1–3
- Do Criminogenic Needs Matter in Non-Secure Settings? Assessing Change . . .
Despite relatively low crime rates in Norway, there has been a recent increase in youth offending, with persistent juvenile offenders posing significant new challenges to both the justice and child welfare systems (Bhuller Røgeberg, 2022)
- The Impact of Institutional Differences on Juveniles in Correctional . . .
This environment is especially disadvantageous to juvenile persons who are detained or incarcerated in adult detention centers because they are not mentally and physiologically strong enough to endure the rigors of an adult prisoner
- Why Youth Incarceration Fails: An Updated Review of the Evidence
Incarceration harms young people’s physical and mental health, impedes their educational and career success, and often exposes them to abuse And the use of confinement is plagued by severe racial and ethnic disparities
- Crimes Involving Juveniles, 1993–2022
From 1993 to 2022, the rate of nonfatal violent victimization (which includes rape or sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault) declined for persons ages 12 to 17, persons ages 18 to 24, and persons age 25 or older (figure 1)
|
|
|