- The importance of selectively logged forests for tiger . . .
tiger population density in the Reserve The number of individual tigers captured was six Using the M h jackknife estimator the average capture probability per sampling occasion was 0 28 and the corresponding estimate of population size 8–SE 1 89 The overall probability of photo-capturing a tiger present in the sampled area was 0 75
- STATUS OF TIGERS AND PREY IN NEPAL 2018 - National Trust for . . .
were analyzed to estimate protected area-wise tiger populations This revealed an estimate of 18 (16-24) tigers in Parsa National Park and adjoining forests, 93 (89-102) tigers in Chitwan National Park and adjoining forests, 21 (18-30) tigers in Banke National Park and adjoining forests, 87 (82-97) tigers in Bardia National Park and
- A survey of livestock losses caused by Asiatic wild dogs . . .
A survey of livestock losses caused by Asiatic wild dogs, leopards and tigers, and of the impact of predation on the livelihood of farmers in Bhutan
- Worlds Wild Tiger Count Rises For First Time in Over a Century
But the gains, as they were, could’ve just been the consequence of better counting methods, and the number of wild tigers—3,890—still pales in comparison to historic levels, like in the year
- India Reports a Gain in Wild Tiger Population - The New York . . .
The survey, released by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, put India’s current tiger population at 1,706, compared with 1,411 in 2006 The new figure is an extrapolation based on
- Status of tigers, - NTCA
5,500 km2 and an estimated population of 126 tigers (b) Satpura-Melghat landscape of 12,700 km 2 with a tiger occupancy in 4,432 km and a population estimate of 78 tigers (c) Bandhavgarh-Sanjay-Guru Ghasidas-Palamau landscape of over 25,000km 2 with a current tiger occupancy in 3,844 kmand a population estimate of about 74 tigers
- Animal Density and Track Counts: Understanding the . . . - PLOS
The accuracy of these mean estimates approached the true densities once the cumulative survey effort reached about 250 km or a sample penetration of 1 km of transect per 10 km 2 of survey area At this effort, CIs around point estimates were 73% of the mean density for gemsbok and 54% of the mean density for steenbok
|